Benchmark your reports before your clients do
Grammarly doesn't make you a worse writer — it makes your writing better before anyone else reads it. SurveyChecker does the same for survey reports: an independent benchmark against the SurveyChecker Standard™, applied before a report reaches the client.
Consistency across the team
Every report measured against the same published methodology — so a firm's quality doesn't depend on who wrote the report or who reviewed it that week.
Fewer complaints, better files
Reports that explain materials, follow the evidence trail and match ratings to findings generate fewer client queries — and a pre-issue QA record strengthens the file if one ever arrives.
Development, not surveillance
The five-test outcomes show each surveyor where their reports are strongest and where they hedge — a training signal drawn from their own work, not a generic course.
Quality assurance that works for you, not against you
- The same methodology for every report — transparent, published, and anchored to the RICS Home Survey Standard
- Reports that meet the standard are confirmed in writing — most do
- Findings cite section and page, so review takes minutes rather than a re-read
- A documented pre-issue QA step your PI insurer will recognise
- Aligned with the RICS professional standard on responsible AI use — the methodology is professional and public, with AI as one component
The signal on every section, every report
Recorded outcomes, section by section — so a team sees exactly where its reports are strongest and where they hedge.
Our position
SurveyChecker exists to raise report quality across the profession, not to catch anyone out. We don't sell surveys, we take no referral fees, and the same Standard is applied whether a report is uploaded by its author or its reader. Most reports pass — and we say so in writing.
See it on one of your own reports
The fastest way to judge the Standard is to run a report through it. Book a demo, or upload a report and see the review it produces.