See report quality before it becomes a claim
Most professional indemnity claims against surveyors begin as report-quality problems: an unreasoned diagnosis, a rating the findings don't support, a limitation never stated. SurveyChecker measures exactly those things — consistently, against a published methodology.
Independent claims triage
A structured, evidence-based review of the report at the centre of a claim — every finding cited to section and page, produced by a methodology neither side authored.
A common quality benchmark
The SurveyChecker Standard gives insurers and their insured firms a shared, transparent definition of what a competent report contains — the same one, whoever asks.
Risk reduction that helps the insured
Firms using pre-issue QA produce cleaner files and fewer disputes. The platform is built to make insured firms better risks, not to build cases against them.
Available today — and what's in development
Per-report quality reviews are live now and can be used in claims triage and underwriting conversations immediately. Portfolio monitoring and firm-level quality trends are in development — if that's the capability you need, we'd like to build it with the people who'll use it. Start that conversation.
Survey quality, made measurable
If report quality drives your loss ratio, it deserves a consistent measure. Talk to us about what that looks like for your book.
Talk to Us